Trylane vs Walnut

Walnut captures your product once, then lets your team build, personalize and embed guided demos, with sandbox demos on its higher plans. Trylane is for self-serve visitors: anyone who clicks Try it gets their own workspace in your real app, with no signup.

Start for free Read the quickstart

The short answer

Choose Trylane if

You sell self-serve and want visitors to try the product unaided.
You're a small team without a demo budget or demo engineers.

Choose Walnut if

Your sales team runs demos and needs to edit every screen.
You need many personalized variants without touching code.

Trylane vs Walnutat a glance

Trylane and Walnut compared
CompareWhat changes for your visitor	Trylane	Walnut
What visitors use	Your real app, in a separate demo deployment	A captured copy of your product, edited in Walnut
Personalization	Personal links fill up to five details, like a company name, into fresh sample data	Edit and personalize captured screens per audience
Who builds it	An engineer, or their coding agent, adds the SDK and reviews it	Sales or marketing, in Walnut's editor
After a UI change	Nothing to redo: visitors use your deployed demo app	Re-capture the screens that changed
Which products	TypeScript apps on PostgreSQL	Anything you can capture
Visitor's work	Can move into the account they open	Stays in the demo
Plans	Free for one product, then monthly	Annual plans; no free plan listed

Follow one click.

A visitor clicks Create. Here is what happens next in each.

Trylane

1Your app receives the request
2Your code saves the record
3The next page shows the result

Walnut

1The player advances
2The next captured screen appears
3No request reaches your backend

Choose Trylane if

You sell self-serve and want visitors to try the product unaided.
You're a small team without a demo budget or demo engineers.
Visitors should be able to keep what they make.

Choose Walnut if

Your sales team runs demos and needs to edit every screen.
You need many personalized variants without touching code.
Your product isn't built on TypeScript and PostgreSQL.

More comparisons

Loading…

Trylane vs Walnutat a glance

Trylane and Walnut compared
CompareWhat changes for your visitor	Trylane	Walnut
What visitors use	Your real app, in a separate demo deployment	A captured copy of your product, edited in Walnut
Personalization	Personal links fill up to five details, like a company name, into fresh sample data	Edit and personalize captured screens per audience
Who builds it	An engineer, or their coding agent, adds the SDK and reviews it	Sales or marketing, in Walnut's editor
After a UI change	Nothing to redo: visitors use your deployed demo app	Re-capture the screens that changed
Which products	TypeScript apps on PostgreSQL	Anything you can capture
Visitor's work	Can move into the account they open	Stays in the demo
Plans	Free for one product, then monthly	Annual plans; no free plan listed

Trylane vs Walnut

Trylane vs Walnutat a glance

Follow one click.

Choose Trylane if

Choose Walnut if

More comparisons

Let your next visitor use the real thing.

Trylane vs Walnut

Trylane vs Walnutat a glance

Follow one click.

Choose Trylane if

Choose Walnut if

More comparisons

Let your next visitor
use the real thing.